|
Story of the Week:
Cost
uncertainties cloud Bank of America’s credit outlook
After about $50bn of asset sales since
early 2010 that saw Bank of America (BofA) cede its position as the largest US
bank by assets, the bank is considering selling additional assets to improve
capital levels. BofA, currently one of the weakest US banks after damages
inflicted by the US subprime mortgage crisis, may need up to $45bn more capital
by 2019 to satisfy Basel III capital requirements. If BofA raises capital through retained
earnings or other methods instead of selling assets, the capital accumulation may
be slow. This could leave BofA lagging behind its major US competitors in
complying with new capital requirements. The consideration for ramping up asset
sales came after the bank made a series of attempts to boost its capital,
including the sale of its stake in the China Construction Bank (CCB), $5bn in
investments from Berkshire Hathaway, and an issuance of $400mn common shares.
Notably, BofA’s gain from selling its stake in CCB, and other cost cutting led
the bank to post a profit of $6.2bn in the third quarter of 2011, recovering
from a loss in the previous quarter.
However, BofA faces
mounting challenges as the bank has been suffering from considerable legal
settlement costs. BofA originally agreed on an $8.5bn settlement with investors
seeking compensation stemming from faulty mortgage bonds that they purchased
from Countrywide, a loss-making BofA subsidiary. The case was recently moved to
state court, where BofA could face higher settlement costs, as investors
considered the original settlement amount to be too low. Some estimates put
BofA’s settlement costs for the Countrywide case at $53bn, after $33.2bn losses
already incurred in relation to the subsidiary. Meanwhile, BofA is in dispute
with Fannie Mae over the government sponsored entity’s new stance on mortgages
that lost insurance coverage, which would see banks buying back uninsured
loans. This could lead to a surge in BofA’s loan buyback expenses, or claims
and penalties if BofA refused to accept the new demand.
BofA’s revenue generating capacity has
also been affected after the Fed imposed a new ceiling on fees for debit-card
purchases in October, and BofA cancelled its plan to charge a monthly $5 debit
card fee, which was originally intended to replace lost revenues.
BofA’s credit outlook
is worsening in line with the uncertainty over its legal costs and an impaired
revenue generating ability. The RMI CRI’s 1-year PD for BofA soared to 206.8bps
on December 30 2011, compared to 52.2bps on June 30 when its $8.5bn settlement agreement brought some
temporary relief about legal costs. Reflecting its relative weak position among US
banks, its PD has been higher than the aggregate PD of the US banking sector
since September. The US banking sector’s 1-year PD was 106.6bps on December 30.
Read more:
BofA mulls more asset
sales to boost capital (Reuters)
Heavy Is the Head
That Wears Crown
(WSJ)
The Lawsuits Plaguing
Bank Of America
(Forbes)
Uncertainty Looms In
Bank Of America's $8.5 Billion Countrywide Settlement (Forbes)
BofA's Clash With
Fannie Escalates Over Loan Buyback Stance (Bloomberg)
Bank of America
Eliminates Plan for $5 Debit-Card Fee(Bloomberg)
BofA Agrees to $8.5
Billion Settlement, Sees Quarterly Loss (Bloomberg)
Tepco credit
outlook exacerbates
The financial
position of Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco) has deteriorated substantially in the
wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster,
with the company facing increasing government pressure to nationalize.
Approached by Japanese officials on December 27, Tepco was urged to consider a
range of options to restore its financial health, in order to facilitate
responsible handling of the crisis, including temporary nationalization. On the
same day, Tepco requested ¥689.4bn in government aid, the
second such request after the Japanese government’s Nuclear Damage
Liability Facilitation Fund disbursed about ¥900bn to Tepco in
November.
The Fukushima nuclear
disaster has left considerable cost pressures on the company. Compensation
payments to victims is likely to reach around ¥4.5tn by 2013,
crippling the financial health of Tepco, which has already reported a ¥1.2tn net loss in 2010 and is expecting a
¥600bn loss in the year ending March 2012. In addition, Tepco’s operational
costs are increasing after the company shut down a majority of its nuclear
plants and switched to more costly thermal power.
Meanwhile, Tepco’s
financing is at risk, after the company’s second-largest lender, Mizuho
Financial Group, stressed three conditions that Tepco needs to meet before it
can obtain additional borrowing. Backing from the Japanese government,
restarting its nuclear power plants and increasing electricity rates to cover
costs are the three key criteria Mizuho specified.
Whether Tepco can be
saved from bankruptcy is still uncertain. Aside from the massive compensation
costs and increased operation costs Tepco faces, the idea of nationalization is
strongly opposed by Tepco’s president. Reflecting Tepco’s negative credit
outlook, the RMI CRI’s 1-year PD for the company surged to 722bps on December
30 2011. The PD was 3.6bps at the end of February of the same year.
Read more:
Tepco under pressure
to nationalise
(FT)
Tepco Requests $8.8B
More Aid for Japan Disaster (Bloomberg)
Tepco shares fall on
fears that it may be nationalised (BBC News)
Japan May Plan ‘Good
Tepco, Bad Tepco’
(Bloomberg)
|
Date
|
Country
|
Title
|
Summary
|
|
Dec 28, 2011
|
US
|
Fed seeks to curb repo market
risk
|
The Federal Reserve has sponsored an industry taskforce to
work on a plan to reduce systemic risk in the tri-party repurchase (repo)
market, which provides crucial financing for securities dealers, and
currently has about $1.8tn in daily turnover.
Tri-party repos are collateralized loans between cash
investors, such as money market funds, and security dealers, with clearing
banks acting as an intermediary. Clearing banks provide securities dealers
with intraday credits to cover daily timing mismatches between investors’
demand for cash, and dealers’ collateral availability. Such credits
effectively transfer the default risks of dealers (the borrowers) from cash
investors to clearing banks. This arrangement can be problematic as the
intraday credit exposures faced by clearing banks are usually large relative
to their capital. More importantly, dealers stand the risks of being refused
credits by the clearing banks, which could in turn create instability in the
repo market and spill over to other markets. If distressed dealers
(borrowers) have to liquidate their security portfolios, the value of the
collaterals owed to the clearing banks may further decline, which could
create excessive market volatility.
The taskforce aims to bring greater automation to the repo
market by setting u real-time settlement processes for new and maturing
repos, which would reduce dealers’ need for intraday credit from clearing
banks..
The plan could also lead to a
public sector body clearing repo trades, a role currently undertaken by JPMorgan
and BNY Mellon in the US.
However, disparity in the operational capacities of dealers
and cash investors, as well as potential conflicts with business and
commercial interests, could make implementation of such a system uncertain.
Read more:
Fed seeks to curb
repo market risk (FT)
Tri-Party Repos
Remain Vulnerable to Systemic Shock (WSJ)
Remaining Risks in
the Tri-Party Repo Market (Federal Reserve Bank of New York)
|
|
Dec
25, 2011
|
China
|
China
May Establish Credit Rating Agency
|
China's central
bank Governor Zhou Xiaochuan on December 25 urged large financial
institutions in China to reduce reliance on credit ratings provided by
foreign credit rating agencies. The advice came at a time when global credit
rating agencies’ business model is being questioned due to its lack of
independence from borrowers. In related news, China is considering creating
credit-rating companies backed by the government.
Amid the expansion
of China's bond market, senior bankers and government officials are calling
for a larger role for China's own credit rating firms, due to their local
expertise. Moreover, China’s domestic rating firms could serve as
alternatives to the top three global credit rating agencies in local
financial products.
The first credit
rating agency in China that generated earnings from investors rather than
borrowers was established in September 2010, called China Credit Rating Co.
China’s first domestic rating agency, Dagong Global Credit Rating Co Ltd,
released the first Chinese assessment of sovereign credit ratings for 50
countries in July 2010.
Read More:
China may establish
credit-rating agencies (China Economic Review)
PBOC’s Governor
Zhou Says China Should Cut Reliance on Foreign Ratings (Bloomberg)
PBOC
Urges Less Reliance on Foreign Credit Ratings (ChinaDaily)
|
|
Dec 25, 2011
|
Global
|
US
and Japanese Firms See Opportunities in Europe’s Woes
|
The ongoing debt
crisis in Europe is presenting firms and financial institutions in the US and
Japan with opportunities to buy assets
unloaded by European banks, ranging from loans and real estate, to
subsidiaries both within and outside Europe.
European banks are selling their assets as they attempt to raise
capital ratios, while US and Japanese firms are motivated by significant
expansion opportunities in the markets ceded by European banks, including
lending and trading businesses.
By
asset sales, European banks can increase cash levels, and have fewer assets
they need to hold capital for, thereby increasing the capital ratio. Some
market participants believe that more asset sales are coming in the following
months as European banks are rushing to increase their core tier 1 capital
ratio to 9% by June,
the deadline imposed by the European Banking Authority (EBA).
Buying
assets from European banks may seem attractive to Japanese banks who are
facing credit contraction and US firms who can snap up market shares. But
investing in Europe still bears risks considering the economic and financial woes
in Europe.
Read
more:
US Firms See Opportunities in Europe’s Woes (NY Times)
Japan lenders eye
European bank assets ( FT)
|
|
Dec 26, 2011
|
South Korea
|
Regulator
to tighten guidelines on credit card issuance
|
South
Korea's financial regulator, the Financial Services Commission (FSC),
announced December 26 it plans to toughen requirements for credit card
issuance, as it attempts to contain the country’s soaring household debts,
and the risks the debts pose to the financial sector.
Under the plan, the FSC would raise
requirements for credit card applications, intensify monitoring of credit
card firms with heavy marketing costs, and increase inspection on firms
aggressively expanding consumer credit card businesses.
South
Korean credit card purchases climbed to 415.6tn won in the first nine months
of 2011, a 9.1% increase from the same period in 2010, driven by soaring
consumer credit spending. Many credit card users are believed to have
relatively low credit worthiness, which has increased concerns about consumer
defaults.
A
further increase in credit card loans could add to default risks to credit
card issuers. The average default rate for South Korea’s credit card
companies increased by 0.17% to 1.74% at the end of September 2011, from
1.57% in June.
Read
more:
Regulator
to tighten guidelines on credit card issuance
(Yonhap News Agency)
|
|
Dec 28, 2011
|
China
|
Funds expect surge of
bad loans in China
|
According to some foreign
and domestic distressed debt funds, the Chinese debt market is bracing for a
significant influx of bad loans as Chinese banks dispose of their existing
ones. The move is believed to prepare the banks for a surge of new bad debts
that are expected to emerge following the Chinese government’s credit binge
during the 2008-09 financial crisis. The influx may also be motivated by
Chinese banking regulators urging banks to boost their capital cushions, as
regulators believe that banks are underreporting their bad loans. Another
reason could be tougher reporting requirements for banks listing in Hong
Kong. However, banks could make room for new lending by disposing legacy bad
loans.
Many foreign distressed
asset investors have tapped the Chinese market before, only to be left
unsatisfied due to problems arising from enforcing rights over assets, and
inaccurate financial statements. However, many other foreign investors are
still interested in buying China’s distressed debts, which have become more
attractive because the government has increased protection of investor’s
rights.
Chinese regulators contend
that the amount of bad loans in China is less than $500bn, while Fitch
estimated that the amount could be over $2tn.
Read More:
Funds
expect surge of bad loans in China (FT)
|
| |
| |